Bob Arnott
The Death of the Risk Premium -
RD Arnott, RJ Ryan - Journal of Portfolio Management, 2001 - iijpm.com
… A pension fund’s objective is 1) to pay or fund the pension liability, 2) at the
lowest cost to the plan sponsor, 3) subject to sensible risk. .
THE “RIGHT WAY” TO VIEW
THE ASSET/LIABILITY PUZZLE
The way we deal with risk depends on how we
define it. This is often a more complicated task than appears.
In pensions, risk is not funding liabilities correctly. Since
pension assets are the primary source of funding liabilities,
risk here can be measured only when you compare the
risk/reward of assets vis-à-vis the liabilities they are fund-
ing. The no-risk asset is the asset that funds the liability with cer-
tainty. A risky asset is one that has much uncertainty about
its risk/reward behavior vis-à-vis the liability it is funding.
The risk-free asset to fund a ten-year fixed liability would
be a ten-year Treasury zero-coupon bond (STRIPS).
This is why FASB ruled that liabilities are to be priced
as high-quality zero-coupon bonds, because they represent
the no-risk portfolio. Assets are to be compared to this zero-
coupon liability portfolio to understand the relative risk and
reward such assets produce in their goal to fund liabilities.
Until the growth rate and the volatility of liabilities
are correctly measured and analyzed, pension risk can
never be understood and managed properly. Since all pen-
sion liabilities are different and unique to each plan, only
a custom liability index could represent the true pension
liability objective. Once a custom liability index is
designed, then and only then can we make the policy
asset allocation decisions, notably, the appropriate depar-
tures from the risk-minimizing portfolio. The risk-min-
imizing asset allocation depends on a custom liability
index for its shape of liabilities.
http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:7zDTcER0SVcJ:www.iijpm.com/jlevypdfs/JPM%2520SP%252001%2520Arnott.pdf+pensions%2Brisk
This entry was posted
on Sunday, April 29th, 2007 at --- and is filed under Pension.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.