Archive for September, 2007

Absolute Disaster (they could change the name)

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

www.iht.com

Absolute Capital hedge fund shares plummet after a founder quits

By David Clarke Bloomberg News

Published: September 19, 2007

EDINBURGH: Florian Homm, a founder and co-chief investment officer of the hedge fund Absolute Capital Management Holdings, has quit after a disagreement with the board. Shares of the fund plummeted 70 percent.

The dispute centered on pay for top fund managers and whether executives should follow his lead in turning down bonuses and contributing shares to support the funds during market turmoil, Homm said in a letter to shareholders Tuesday. His departure from the firm, which oversees $3.25 billion, is effective Wednesday.

“His letter speaks of various disagreements with the board but reviewing it I don’t see any area where there was disagreement,” the chief executive, Jonathan Treacher, said in an interview from the company’s main office in Majorca, Spain. “I’m fairly surprised. We never discussed him resigning.”

Homm and the former chairman, Sean Ewing, set up Absolute Capital in 2004 and carried out an initial public offering last year. In the letter, Homm said he became concerned about the performance of certain funds and last month contributed shares worth about €33 million, or $45.7 million, to “help investors ride out the instability in the markets.” As a result, those funds ended higher or neutral for the month, he said.

Homm said the board “did not agree with my arguments that ACMH needs to pay adequate compensation to retain top-level fund managers nor did they follow my lead in sacrificing personal bonuses and compensation or in contributing ACMH shares to the funds.”

Today in Marketplace by Bloomberg

Absolute Capital shares fell 271.5 pence to close at 118.5 pence in London.

Homm said in the letter he does not intend to start another fund to compete with Absolute Capital and that he remains the largest shareholder. He could not be reached for comment.

“If you look at our performance, it seems to be OK,” said Treacher, who was named chief executive in July. “I don’t think it’s particularly great, but then markets haven’t been that great in the last couple of months and we’ve had difficulties like other people.”

Homm directly oversaw three funds at Absolute Capital. The Absolute European Catalyst Fund and the Absolute Activist Value Fund each gained about 0.5 percent in August, the company said Tuesday. The Absolute Octane fund lost about 0.7 percent.

The company reported on July 25 that first-half profit almost tripled to €32.4 million as bets on emerging markets paid off and assets under management rose. Revenue more than doubled to €61.6 million.

The announcement from Homm, “came out of the blue completely,” Ewing said. “As you can imagine, for me, as a material shareholder, it’s a big blow.”

////////////////////////////////////////////////

Who is Homm?

Florian Homm’s highly public exit from Absolute Capital Management was executed in the style with which he managed the hedge funds at the company he co-founded: he issued a press release, copying it to the board.Mr Homm is a larger-than-life version of the hedge fund archetype, and not just because he is 6ft 6in. A specialist in the world of small companies, an expert in German business, twice fined by German financial regulators and a serial entrepreneur, Mr Homm chose Majorca as his base.“He’s a maverick,” says a former investor. “He’s very much a solo operator.”

Last year, he added to his public image when he was shot in Venezuela. Observers assumed at first that he had had a run-in with a client or competitor. In fact, as AbCap told investors, he was the victim of a botched robbery. This did not stop him returning to work within weeks.

His skill was in picking smaller companies, often taking big stakes in names such as Borussia Dortmund, the German football club. Over time it has paid off for investors.

The profile of Mr Homm on the Absolute Capital website tells us that its former CIO started his first investment company at 18, has worked at Merrill Lynch, Fidelity and Julius Baer, and has an MBA from Harvard Business School and a BA in Economics, cum laude.

DT Center for Banking Solutions

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007
Center for Banking Solutions
 
The Deloitte Center for Banking Solutions, part of Deloitte & Touche USA LLP, provides insight and strategies to solve complex issues that affect the competitiveness of banks operating in the U.S. We invite you to learn more about our program and how you may benefit from our research, executive forums and industry benchmarking on Public PolicyOperational Excellence and Growth.

Regulatory Outlook: Key areas on the horizon for banks
There is no doubt that the rules of banking have changed dramatically over the past two decades. However, as banking and finance activities have become more complex, so have the rules of the road.

In response, many bankers have observed that the regulatory compliance task has become exceedingly challenging and the cost of compliance is growing at a rate that is unsustainable. In our new point-of-view, Regulatory Outlook produced by the Deloitte Center for Banking Solutions, we examine the broad range of regulations and offer analysis and perspective on the key issues facing banks today.

Regulatory Outlook: Key areas on the horizon for banks
Read our point of view.
Global Banking Industry Outlook: Issues on the Horizon 2007 Global Banking Industry Outlook: Issues on the
Horizon 2007

Read our point of view.

http://www.deloitte.com/dtt/section_node/0,1042,sid%253D133

625,00.html?WT.srch=1&WT.mc_id=USGoogle

_CBS_Risk&gclid=CM6E7ZuDz44CFSBMGgod7ljIAg

next-finance.fr

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007
artoff1179.jpg Dossiers & News Le Hedge funds Renaissance Technologies a franchi sans heurt le mois d’août

17 septembre 2007

Selon Stefano Russo, Renaissance Technologies se porte comme un charme, son fonds Renaissance Institutional Equities fund a gagné 0.4% en août et son fondateur milliardaire Jim Simons n’est pas encore à la retraite.

En savoir plus

http://www.next-finance.fr/

artoff1176.jpg Innovations La Banque Mondiale et ABN AMRO lancent une obligation écologique

17 septembre 2007

La commercialisation de l’obligation World Bank Eco-3 Plus permettra à la Banque Mondiale d’obtenir des capitaux pour financer les projets de développement durable et lutter contre la pauvreté…

En savoir plus

artoff1180.jpg Dossiers & News Coup dur pour les traders Michael Farmer et Christian Siva-Jothy

17 septembre 2007

Malgré 40 années sur les marchés et une réputation de trader numéro un sur les métaux, Michael Farmer a subi de plein fouet la crise. Christian Siva-Jothy, ex trader chez Goldman Sachs a lui perdu son associé.

En savoir plus

artoff1178.jpg Produits financiers Qu’est ce qu’un Wedding Cake ?

17 septembre 2007

Le wedding cake est un produit qui parie sur la stabilité d’un indice, d’une action ou d’une devise. Plus le sous-jacent est stable, plus le rendement est élevé…

En savoir plus

artoff1129.gif Dossiers & News Robert Merton prépare le lancement d’une nouvelle société de gestion d’actifs

4 septembre 2007

Malgré le retentissant échec de LTCM, le célébrissime Prix Nobel d’économie s’apprête à lancer une nouvelle société d’investissement…

En savoir plus

TIPS Prove Best of Treasuries

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

TIPS Prove Best of Treasuries as Fed Mulls Lower Rates, Oil, Gold Advance Inflation-linked bonds, the best- performing Treasury securities this year, may get even better as the Federal Reserve considers lowering the nation’s benchmark interest rate for the first time since 2003.

TIPS Prove Treasuries’ Best as Fed Mulls Lower Rates (Update2)
By Daniel Kruger

Sept. 17 (Bloomberg) — Inflation-linked bonds, the best- performing Treasury securities this year, may get even better as the Federal Reserve considers lowering the nation’s benchmark interest rate for the first time since 2003.

Treasury Inflation Protected Securities returned 6.54 percent since December and have beaten every category in Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s U.S. Government Credit Index, a gauge of Treasuries and corporate debt that has appreciated 3.82 percent.

TIPS will do better than any other fixed-income securities as long as the perception persists that inflation will accelerate while the central bank tries to counter a deepening housing slump and rising unemployment, said Wan-Chong Kung, who helps oversee $36 billion in fixed income at FAF Advisors in Minneapolis.

“Some drivers for inflation still seem to be very much alive and well,” said Kung, who bought 10-year TIPS last month. The “notion the Fed is having to mind the store on the growth front and let things slack off on the inflation front” means the securities will continue to outperform, she said.

Inflation-linked securities increased in value as gasoline prices rose to an 11-year high, crude oil reached a record and gold exceeded $700 an ounce.

Yields on TIPS due in 10 years are 2.25 percentage points lower than those on 10-year Treasury notes, a gap that represents the rate of inflation investors expect over the life of the securities. Investors are willing to accept lower yields because principal on inflation-protected notes increases annually at the rate of the consumer price index, which rose 2.4 percent through July.

Policy Shift

Interest-rate futures show investors see a 58 percent probability the Fed will lower as soon as tomorrow its 5.25 percent target for overnight loans between banks by as much as a half-percentage point. Odds for a quarter-percentage point reduction are 42 percent.

Bets on the Fed increased in the past month as Calabasas, California-based Countrywide Financial Corp., the biggest U.S. mortgage lender, and dozens of other companies and investment funds were unable to complete routine financings using commercial paper after the collapse of subprime mortgages. A Labor Department report Sept. 7 showed the economy shed jobs in August for the first time since 2003.

The Fed on Aug. 17 cut the rate it charges banks for direct loans by half a percentage point to 5.75 percent and said “risks to growth have increased appreciably,” while leaving out language that showed inflation was the primary risk to the economy. Ten days earlier, the central bank held its overnight rate steady and said inflation remained its “predominant” concern.

Preferred Measure

Janet Yellen, head of the San Francisco Fed, cited “significant downward pressure” on growth because of housing and financial-market turmoil on Sept. 10. Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart backed off remarks he made four days earlier that the housing slump was having a limited impact, saying the slowdown in employment actually began in June.

The Fed’s preferred measure of inflation, personal spending on items excluding food and energy, rose at a 1.9 percent annual rate in July, near the top of the central bank’s preferred 1 percent to 2 percent range.

Yields on 10-year notes rose 8 basis points to 4.46 percent last week, according to New York-based bond broker Cantor Fitzgerald LP. It was the first increase in five weeks. The 4.75 percent note maturing in August 2017 fell 21/32, or $6.56 per $1,000 face amount to 102 8/32. The yield on 10-year TIPS rose 2 basis points to 2.21 percent. Ten-year nominal notes yielded 4.49 percent today, while TIPS climbed to 2.24 percent.

`Underlying Inflation’

TIPS gained because of the increase in energy and food prices, said Michael Pond, an interest-rate strategist in New York at Barclays Capital Inc., one of the 21 primary dealers of Treasuries who trade with the Fed.

Crude oil reached a record $80.36 a barrel in New York last week after supplies dropped the most this year. Gold futures for December delivery touched $726.30, the highest since May 2006. Traders speculating the Fed will cut rates drove the dollar to a record low of $1.3927 per euro last week, which may lift import prices.

“There still are plenty of strong underlying inflation pressures coming from food prices, energy prices” and a falling dollar, Pond said. “Even a slightly weaker U.S. economy doesn’t mean that the U.S. is going to get slower inflation.”

While a report from the University of Michigan and Reuters Group Plc showed consumer confidence increased in September, their sentiment index remained near the lowest level in a year.

The securities also benefited from their longer duration, a measure of sensitivity to interest rates that helped them gain more as yields dropped, he said.

Growth Forecasts

The best of the gains in TIPS may be over because the economy will “really soften in the next year” and cool inflation expectations, said Ken Volpert, who oversees $10.7 billion of the securities at Valley Forge, Pennsylvania-based Vanguard Group. Volpert is buying the debt because investors added about $1.2 billion into his fund.

That will cause breakeven rates on five-year TIPS to narrow to 1.5 percentage points, from about 2 percentage points now, Volpert said.

The economy will likely expand at an annualized 2.2 percent rate next quarter, down from 2.4 percent this quarter, before rebounding to a 2.8 percent clip a year from now, according to the median estimate in the Bloomberg News survey published Sept. 10. Inflation as measured by the consumer price index will accelerate to 3.3 percent in the fourth quarter from 2.6 percent in the current period, a separate survey says.

Delinquency Rate

Breakeven rates have narrowed as traders speculated the economy would slow as banks restrict loans after higher default rates on subprime mortgages. The 10-year breakeven rate fell to 2.19 percentage points on Sept. 5, the lowest since January 2004. On June 12, the rate was 2.47 percentage points, near the highest since August 2006.

The delinquency rate on subprime mortgages rose to 14.8 percent in June, a five-year high, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association. “Most banks reported that the recent developments in financial markets had led to tighter lending standards for residential mortgages,” according to the Fed’s Sept. 5 Beige Book report.

The government introduced TIPS in 1997 under then-Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin as a way for investors to hedge against inflation. Rubin is now chairman of Citigroup Inc.’s executive committee. He didn’t return a call seeking comment.

Fed Cycles

The start of the previous two cycles of Fed rate cuts in 1998 and 2001 helped TIPS rally as lower borrowing costs stoked the economy and concerns prices would accelerate, according to a report from Credit Suisse.

In 1998, the 10-year breakeven rate increased from about 75 basis points to above 100 basis points within a few weeks after the Fed’s first rate cut, according to Credit Suisse. In 2001, the rate rose from about 130 basis points to 175 in three weeks.

The bulk of investor gains occur in “the first few weeks” after the initial cuts, said Alex Li, an interest-rate strategist in New York at Credit Suisse Securities USA LLC, a primary dealer. “The more the Fed cuts, the more outperformance you would expect from TIPS.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Daniel Kruger in New York at dkruger1@bloomberg.net

Last Updated: September 17, 2007 09:06 EDT

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?

pid=20601109&sid=aD_rfo3whKeA&refer=exclusive

HillaryCare II

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

HillaryCare’s New Clothes
Different means but the same political destination.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007 12:01 a.m. EDT
Hillary Clinton has been blasted for months by her Democratic Presidential rivals because, until Monday, she hadn’t delivered her formal campaign promises for “universal” health care. But John Edwards and Barack Obama were unfair. She beat them to the punch by at least 13 years.

The former first lady’s 1993-94 health-care overhaul ended disastrously. Still, it poured the philosophical and policy foundations of the current health-care debate. As she unveils HillaryCare II, Mrs. Clinton likes to joke that it’s “deja vu all over again”–and it is, unfortunately. Her new plan is called “Health Choices” and mentions “choice” so many times that it sounds like a Freudian slip. And sure enough, “choice” for Mrs. Clinton means using different means that will arrive at the same end: an expensive, bureaucratic, government-run system that restricts choice.

Begin with the “individual mandate.” The latest fad after Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts miracle, it compels everyone to have insurance, either through their employers or the government. Not only would this element of HillaryCare require a huge new enforcement bureaucracy, it is twinned with a “pay or play” tax on businesses that don’t, or can’t afford to, provide health insurance to their employees. The plan also creates a new public insurance option, modeled after Medicare, and open to everyone, regardless of income. To keep insurance “affordable,” HillaryCare II offers a refundable tax credit that limits cost to a certain percentage of income. Yet the program works at cross-purposes, because coverage mandates always drive up the price of insurance. And if the “pay or play” tax is lower than a company’s current health insurance costs, a company will have every incentive to dump its employee plan and pay the tax.

Meanwhile, the private insurance industry would be restructured with far more stringent regulations. Mrs. Clinton would require nationally “guaranteed issue,” which means insurers have to offer policies to all applicants. She would also command “community rating,” which prohibits premium differences based on health status.

Both of these have raised costs enormously in the states that require them (such as New York), but Mrs. Clinton says they are necessary nationwide to prevent “discrimination” that infringes “on the central purposes of insurance, which is to share risk.” Not quite. The central purpose of insurance is to price, and hedge against, reasonably predictable risks. It does not require socializing every last expense and redistributing wealth.

No liberal reform would be complete without repealing the Bush tax cuts of 2001 and 2003; Mrs. Clinton would foot the bill for her plan with this tax increase. The rest of the estimated $110 billion per year in new government spending would be achieved by “modernizing” health-care delivery and “promoting wellness,” though this $35 billion in savings is speculative, if not fanciful. Further tax hikes would be required: That $110 billion is a back-of-the-envelope calculation, and Team Hillary is keeping the specifics in its pocket.

Given how poorly “universal” policies fared the last time around, who can blame them? Mrs. Clinton and Ira Magaziner headed a health-care task force with more than 500 members that eventually produced 1,342 numbing pages of proposals. It’s hardly surprising this boondoggle died without so much as a Congressional vote. Yet Mrs. Clinton insisted that the public had been spooked by Rush Limbaugh, an article in a marginal political journal and advertising campaigns such as “Harry and Louise.” In other words, the lessons she learned were political, not substantive. She thought she had overreached with too-sweeping changes. So she and her husband began to slice their universal health-care ambitions into smaller initiatives like the 1997 State Children’s Health Insurance Program (Schip).

This is her strategy now. HillaryCare II is designed to cause minimal disruptions to current private insurance coverage in the short run, while dressing up the old agenda with slightly different mechanisms and rhetoric. Rather than fight small business, this time she is trying to seduce it with tax credits for small companies that provide insurance. Only later when costs rise will the credits shrink or other taxes rise. To court large manufacturers, like the auto and steel industries, she’ll offer another, “temporary” tax credit to subsidize their health-care liabilities. Her plan, in short, is HillaryCare I in better clothes–a transitional platform to shift people to the default option, which is government insurance.

What’s striking about all this is how little new thinking there is. Like the other Democratic proposals, HillaryCare II would mark another major government intrusion into health care. It would keep all of the system’s current problems, most of them created by government policies, and entrench and expand them. The creativity is all in the political repackaging.

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110010623

Bernanke Cuts on Slump `Potential,’

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007

As of 3:58:00 PM EDT Tue, September 18, 2007
THE FED CUT the federal funds rate by a half percentage point to 4.75% to counter a freeze-up in financial markets that threatens to deepen the housing slump and drag the down the entire economy. (Statement) 3:51 p.m.
• Economists, Readers React: ‘One and Done’?
• Vote: Did the Fed make the right move?
• Econ Blog: Requests for Discount Rate Cuts

As of 3:58:00 PM EDT Tue, September 18, 2007

THE FED CUT the federal funds rate by a half percentage point to 4.75% to counter a freeze-up in financial markets that threatens to deepen the housing slump and drag the down the entire economy. (Statement) 3:51 p.m.

Economists, Readers React: ‘One and Done’?

Vote: Did the Fed make the right move?

Econ Blog: Requests for Discount Rate Cuts


Ottawa
Citizen

Bernanke Cuts on Slump `Potential,’ Adopting Greenspan Approach
Bloomberg - 1 hour ago
19 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke adopted the approach of his predecessor Alan Greenspan, reducing interest rates to pre-empt an
Bernanke faces political heat on subprime MSNBC
Bernanke Facing Some Tough Scrutiny The Associated Press
Bernanke Weighs Recession Risk Against Bailout Charge (Update2) Bloomberg
Hindustan Times - TheStreet.com
all 2,371 news articles »


Telegraph.co.uk

Bernanke Threads the Needle
The Weekly Standard - 11 hours ago
by Irwin M. Stelzer BEN BERNANKE FOUND that narrow path between the rock and the hard place. He had to add liquidity to a credit market that is experiencing
Bernanke & Co. cut interest rates by half a point; stocks rally FinancialWeek (subscription)
Fed’s Reckless Bubble Blowing - Part II Ben Bernanke and the Financial Sense Online
Rate cut bonanza: Does the next bubble start here? Salon
BloggingStocks - Telegraph.co.uk
all 37 news articles »

Bernanke weighs inflation against a troubled affair
Houston Chronicle, United States - 30 minutes ago
It was still on the rebound from Alan Greenspan when they’d met, and Bernanke knew he’d been aloof. He thought about what people would say if they saw them


The Age

Bernanke’s Bailout
BusinessWeek - 8 hours ago
But he’s also taking risks with inflation by Peter Coy Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke grabbed the spotlight back from his book-writing predecessor,
Greenspan says hopes to reclaim privacy: PBS Reuters
Greenspan sceptical on publishing inflation goals MSNBC
Unindicted Blunderer Forbes
Canada.com - USA Today
all 455 news articles »

 

Bernanke Cuts on Slump `Potential,’ Adopting Greenspan Approach
By Craig Torres

 

Sept. 19 (Bloomberg) — Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke adopted the approach of his predecessor Alan Greenspan, reducing interest rates to pre-empt an economic slump rather than waiting for one to occur.

The Fed yesterday lowered its benchmark interest rate by half a percentage point, surprising most economists and spurring the biggest rally in U.S. stocks since 2003. Policy makers said they based their decision on the “potential” for the sell-off in credit markets to hobble economic growth.

The cut may help alleviate the worst housing recession since 1991 and ease pressure on the Fed in Congress, where lawmakers had called for cheaper borrowing costs. The decrease may also quell criticism on Wall Street that Bernanke, 53, was slow to respond to stress in capital markets. Greenspan pared rates three times in 1998 as currency crises in emerging economies rippled across the globe.

“Bernanke and his colleagues have taken to heart the risk- management approach that Chairman Greenspan used,” said Stephen Cecchetti, a former head of research at the Fed’s New York branch who teaches economics at Brandeis University in Waltham, Massachusetts. “You have to make sure the worst case doesn’t happen,” he said, and the Fed showed that it’s “prepared to go further.”

Sustainable Growth

The Federal Open Market Committee cut the federal funds rate, which banks charge each other for overnight loans, to 4.75 percent, against the expectations of 105 of the 134 forecasters in a Bloomberg News survey. The Fed said in its statement that it “will act as needed to foster price stability and sustainable economic growth.”

Most analysts predicted a smaller cut after Bernanke warned in a speech last month that investors must accept their losses. “It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve — nor would it be appropriate — to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions,” he said.

Now Bernanke may be open to the charge of creating “moral hazard,” or encouraging investors to take on more risk because they think the Fed will make good their losses.

“I don’t regard this as a particularly good move,” said Lee Hoskins, former president of the Fed’s Cleveland branch. The reduction simply delays the reckoning for investors who placed bets that went wrong when credit costs suddenly increased, he said.

Opportunity

Policy makers had thought “this might be an opportunity to instill some financial discipline without too high a cost in terms of economic performance,” said Neal Soss, chief economist at Credit Suisse in New York. “Clearly the balance of that assessment has altered 180 degrees.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed 335.97 points to 13,739.39 after the announcement. The premium that investors demand to buy high-risk, high-yield corporate bonds compared with benchmark Treasuries fell to the smallest this month, Merrill Lynch & Co. data showed.

“FOMC now stands for Friend of Market Committee,” said Chris Rupkey, chief financial economist at Bank of Tokyo- Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. in New York. “It is a bold step that is going to start to calm financial markets.”

The Fed also reduced the rate it charges banks for direct loans by half a point, to 5.25 percent.

Officials had opted to cut the discount rate, instead of their benchmark, on Aug. 17 as confidence deteriorated with the slump in assets tied to subprime mortgages.

Collateral

Policy makers had encouraged banks to use the resource by clarifying that the Fed would accept as collateral asset-backed commercial paper, one of the markets that has contracted with the mortgage debacle.

The approach spurred unease among some investors who advocated a broader cut in borrowing costs. During the past month, traders repeatedly speculated on an emergency move, and futures and Treasury notes reflected expectations for a series of reductions. On Aug. 20, the yield on three-month Treasury bills fell the most in two decades amid a flight to safety.

After the rate decision, Bernanke may get a better reception tomorrow when he appears before the House Financial Services Committee to testify on the credit-market rout.

Representative Barney Frank, the Massachusetts Democrat who chairs the panel, said in an e-mailed statement he was “pleased” with the cut. Frank called on Sept. 7 for a “meaningful” easing. Still, he said yesterday he was “surprised” the Fed continued to note concern about inflation.

`Risks Remain’

In its statement, the FOMC said “some inflation risks remain,” and it will “continue to monitor inflation developments carefully.” The reference shows officials are trying to keep open the option to reverse their move should the economy strengthen, economists said.

Longer-dated Treasuries dropped and gold prices rose after the decision. Yields on 30-year Treasury bonds increased 6 basis points to 4.75 percent late yesterday. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point. Gold futures climbed to a 27-year high of $735.50 an ounce.

The larger-than-expected rate cut “is a repeat of a mistake that the Fed made over and over,” said Allan Meltzer, a Fed historian and professor at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh. The Fed “put all of its chips on the prospect of a possible recession, and very little on the possibility of inflation.”

To contact the reporter on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at ctorres3@bloomberg.net ;

Last Updated: September 19, 2007 00:13 EDT

///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Fed slashes rates

Published: September 18 2007 15:02 | Last updated: September 18 2007 23:35

Ben Bernanke has played his joker early. In his first big test as Federal Reserve chairman, he plumped for shocking the markets with a half-point cut in both the Fed funds rate and the discount rate. That will certainly draw criticism from some quarters that the Fed has panicked in the face of weak but not disastrous economic data. It also risks fuelling the belief that there is a “Bernanke put” – and the Fed will always ride in to save the markets.

In fact, the Fed can probably justify its first half-point move in years. The downside risks to the economy have increased substantially in the past few months. Although the credit squeeze that kicked off in August has started to moderate, banks remain jumpy about lending to each other. Meanwhile, credit has become more expensive and less freely available.

ADVERTISEMENT

That in itself is a concern for economic growth. But when added to the serious weakness obvious in the housing market and poor numbers on job creation, the Fed wanted to throw in some insurance against a worst-case outcome. It is also better informed than anybody about the risks to financial institutions if the credit squeeze continues. The last thing it wants is a Northern Rock-style panic in the US.

Even though inflation expectations have moved up in recent weeks, the Fed felt it had room for manoeuvre. Its preferred measure recently edged back inside its comfort zone. Weak housing – a big component of the index – should help balance out fears of a feed through into core inflation from record oil prices.

However, the real test starts now. If the Fed is willing to shock the market with an unexpected gift, it must also be willing to spring negative surprises when the risks look more balanced. The Fed’s wording did not promise more cuts. If its shock treatment works on the financial system and the economy proves stronger than expected, the central bank must be willing to take back its gift rapidly. If not, Mr Bernanke’s detractors will be proved right.

Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2007

Wednesday, September 19th, 2007
PAGE ONE
   

TODAY’S MOST POPULAR

 
 
1. Fed Cuts Rates by Half Point
2. Expectant Moms Worry About Tattoos
3. Free IBM Software to Challenge Microsoft Office
4. Stocks Jump as Fed Cuts Half Point
5. Lehman Net Falls 3%

MORE


PEOPLE WHO READ THIS…

Also read these stories:

People who like this also like…

Recommendations by loomia  What’s This?

COMPANIES

Dow Jones, Reuters

ABN AMRO Holding N.V. ADS (ABN)

  PRICE
CHANGE
51.22
1.99
9/18

Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC (RBS.LN)

  PRICE
CHANGE
526.00
17.50
9/18

Barclays PLC ADS (BCS)

  PRICE
CHANGE
50.12
3.02
9/18

ArcelorMittal ADS (MT)

  PRICE
CHANGE
71.58
5.32
9/18

London Stock Exchange Group PLC (LSE.LN)

  PRICE
CHANGE
1,411.00
20.00
9/18

CSX Corp. (CSX)

  PRICE
CHANGE
41.29
2.23
9/18

* At Market Close

RELATED INDUSTRIES

Banking

 
  Personalized Home Page Setup
  Put headlines on your homepage about the companies, industries and topics that interest you most.  
 
 

BREAKING THE BANK
For Hedge Funds, Hunting
In Packs Pays Dividends

Financier Hohn Sparks
Battle for ANB Amro,
Gets Help From Allies

By CARRICK MOLLENKAMP, JASON SINGER, ALISTAIR MACDONALD and EDWARD TAYLOR
September 19, 2007; Page A1

LONDON — The world’s biggest banking takeover battle began with a letter from a hedge fund with a heartwarming name: The Children’s Investment Fund. TCI, as the fund is known, donates a chunk of its profits to charities helping orphans and AIDS victims.

The Feb. 20 letter to the board chairman and chief executive of the largest bank in the Netherlands, ABN Amro Holding NV, alleged they were doing a “terrible” job for shareholders. It demanded that the bank be broken up or sold. (Read the letter.)

Behind TCI is one of the hedge-fund world’s most combative financiers, Christopher Hohn of London. The 40-year-old son of a Jamaican car mechanic, Mr. Hohn is part of a network of hedge funds that have swooped down several times on companies and insisted on change.

Executives at some of the targeted companies have complained that the funds push close to the boundaries of securities laws requiring investors to disclose it when they work together. One German chief executive, having been shot down in one of Mr. Hohn’s sorties, wrote a book about the experience titled “Invasion of the Locusts” and called the hedge-fund boss’s style “poison.”

[Price Reaction]

TCI says it has followed the law in each case and acted independently of the funds to which it has ties. Mr. Hohn relishes the fights. A family New Year’s card in 2006 described his “exceptionally exciting year overthrowing German CEOs.”

The $100 billion bidding war over ABN Amro is the biggest example yet of Mr. Hohn sparking change. A bevy of other London funds — some with ties to TCI — joined his campaign. After a furious battle among Europe’s leading banks, a consortium led by Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC is in the driver’s seat to acquire the Dutch bank. ABN Amro’s shareholders meet tomorrow to discuss the consortium’s offer and a lower bid by Britain’s Barclays PLC.

Hedge funds often hunt in packs. In a typical case, several of them have independently acquired shares of a company perceived as undervalued, waiting for the right moment to push for a sale. Once one fund jumps in with a public demand, the rest follow.

That much is legally innocuous. The controversy arises when the attackers have connections among themselves. In some circumstances, laws require the ties to be disclosed, and the group must follow rules that apply to any single shareholder including disclosure of stakes above a certain size. The theory is that the target company and the public are entitled to know when investors acting together own a big stake.

National Differences

National laws differ on the details. In the Netherlands, the relevant jurisdiction in the ABN Amro case, shareholders needn’t disclose cooperation unless they have a formal agreement, Dutch lawyers say. Elsewhere in Europe, the requirement may kick in if funds have common directors or hold stakes in each other. In the U.S., a group is loosely defined as having an agreement or profit-sharing arrangement, among other factors, lawyers say.

Hedge funds are finding plenty of targets in Europe. Some targets are sprawling corporations with units that can be broken off and sold. Others are old-line underperforming businesses that formerly didn’t face activist shareholders. As debt-market troubles make buyouts more difficult, some expect hedge funds to step up their push for internal change at companies.

Mr. Hohn is particularly feared. A BlackBerry devotee, he reads and sends email messages to executives late into the night and into the next morning. Executives whose companies he has targeted talk of his calling them at all hours. In meetings, Mr. Hohn sometimes asks the same question repeatedly, people who have been present say.

His style was on display in September 2006 when he met with executives of Euronext, then an independent company operating stock exchanges in Paris and other European cities. Mr. Hohn said Euronext shareholders deserved the chance to vote on two potential merger partners, the New York Stock Exchange and Deutsche Börse AG. Mr. Hohn, whose hedge fund owned about 10% of Euronext, favored a merger with the German exchange, while Euronext Chief Executive Jean-François Théodore wanted a deal with the NYSE.

The meeting at Mr. Hohn’s headquarters soon turned contentious as Mr. Hohn began lecturing Euronext about shareholders’ rights. “I’m going to make [sure] that shareholders have a choice,” Mr. Hohn said repeatedly.

Mr. Hohn added another jab, alleging that Mr. Théodore wanted a deal with Americans so he could get an American-style pay package. The urbane Frenchman’s expression turned icy. “That is a very serious allegation,” he said, according to a person familiar with the exchange. Mr. Hohn didn’t raise it again. Euronext declined to comment, as did Mr. Théodore, through a spokeswoman.

Mr. Hohn gave up the fight late last year after NYSE’s share price rose, making its share-based offer more valuable, and Deutsche Börse dropped out. In June, Euronext and NYSE agreed to combine in a $20 billion deal.

TCI’s other campaigns have had mixed success. The hedge fund drove Mittal Steel Co., the world’s largest steel maker by output, to pay $2 billion more than it planned to shareholders of the Brazilian unit of a company Mittal had agreed to take over in June. But this year TCI lost a public fight to force Electric Power Development Co. of Japan to pay a big dividend as the former government-owned company marshaled support from establishment shareholders.

Overall, Mr. Hohn’s approach has paid off for his investors. Through August, TCI had risen 9.5% this year, according to a person who has seen the results, compared with a 6.17% gain on the HFRI Fund Weighted Composite Index, a broad industry measure of hedge-fund performance. Last year, TCI posted a return of about 40%, compared with 12.9% for the HFRI index. Its assets total about $10 billion.

Mr. Hohn grew up in Surrey, England. At private-equity firm Apax Partners, colleagues spotted his ambition. “It became obvious he wanted to leave when he published his CV by accident on the central server instead of his private PC,” says Jon Moulton, Mr. Hohn’s boss at the time, who now works at another private-equity firm.

Yale Endowment

After seven years at hedge fund Perry Capital, Mr. Hohn left to run his own fund. TCI opened for business in January 2004, backed by 25 investors, including Yale University’s endowment.

A few months after TCI opened, Mr. Hohn began aiding allies in the business. He helped Edoardo Mercadante, a former asset manager at Merrill Lynch & Co., start a hedge fund called Parvus Asset Management (UK) LLP. Mr. Mercadante says he gave TCI a minority stake in Parvus in return for investor introductions and back-office support. TCI’s two co-heads of business management have served in similar roles for Parvus. TCI has an 18% stake in Parvus, according to TCI filings to U.K. authorities earlier this year.

It’s not uncommon for a hedge fund to lend its infrastructure to a newcomer, in exchange for some kind of remuneration such as a stake in the newcomer. TCI and two funds it assists — Parvus and another fund called Algebris Investments — say they maintain complete autonomy in making investment decisions. They “do not have access to each others’ portfolio positions or trading activity,” TCI said in a statement.

Mr. Hohn has also tapped an influential acquaintance: Lord Jacob Rothschild, a London businessman from the famed European banking dynasty. Lord Rothschild’s investment company or his family have put money into both Parvus and TCI. Lord Rothschild calls Mr. Hohn a “harsh and brilliant critic.” He says, “We heard about Parvus through TCI. We have him to thank for that.”

In January 2005, Mr. Hohn started his first big public fight: trying to force Deutsche Börse to drop its $2.46 billion offer to buy London Stock Exchange PLC. Mr. Hohn thought Deutsche Börse was overpaying. By the end of February, TCI had acquired at least a 5% stake in Deutsche Börse.

Following the TCI move, a New York hedge fund in which Lord Rothschild’s son is a partner chimed in with its own public protests. Around the same time, Lord Rothschild’s fund, of which Mr. Hohn was later named a director, acquired a stake of about £31 million, or about $62 million, in Deutsche Börse, according to that fund’s annual report.

A spokesman for the son’s fund, called Atticus, said in an emailed statement that the fund makes “independent investment decisions.” Lord Rothschild says his fund acted independently of both Atticus and TCI.

The pressure worked. After months of trying to fend off the hedge-fund campaigns, Deutsche Börse Chief Executive Werner Seifert withdrew his offer.

Mr. Hohn wasn’t finished. Next, he called for Mr. Seifert to resign. Mr. Hohn and Lord Rothschild went to Frankfurt to meet with Mr. Seifert and Deutsche Börse Chairman Rolf Breuer in April 2005. Mr. Hohn also took Parvus’s Mr. Mercadante to at least one meeting with Mr. Seifert. A month later, Mr. Seifert threw in the towel and announced he was quitting.

Mr. Seifert bitterly recounted the events in a 2006 book of which he was co-author with a German professor. The title: “Invasion of the Locusts: Intrigues, Power Struggles and Market Manipulation.”

Recalling one conversation with Mr. Hohn, Mr. Seifert wrote, “Hohn claimed that he, together with his allies, had control of between 60% and 80% of Deutsche Börse’s capital and began to read out a long list of owners. At the end, he boasted, ‘My position is so strong that we can bring Mickey Mouse and Donald Duck onto the supervisory board.’”

“His rules of the game are poison for an open and fair market,” Mr. Seifert wrote.

A subsequent investigation into hedge-fund trading of Deutsche Börse by German markets regulator BaFin found there was insufficient evidence to ask prosecutors to bring charges. BaFin didn’t disclose which hedge funds it was investigating, but an official says TCI was among them. Mr. Hohn said at the time, “We have not acted in concert with other shareholders according to the law.”

Mr. Hohn was riding high. In January 2006, a Hohn family holiday card recounted the achievements of the four Hohn children, their mother and the paterfamilias.

Holiday Greetings

“Chris has had an exceptionally exciting year overthrowing German CEOs and expanding his investment conquests to China and Brazil,” the Hohns wrote. The holiday greeting noted that “Chris and his team’s investment performance” was “50% this past year and over 100% return over the last two years.”

Mr. Hohn met his American-born wife, Jamie Cooper-Hohn, at Harvard. He attended the business school there, and she went to the Kennedy School of Government. Formerly an employee at nonprofits in New York and Washington, she now runs the charity funded by TCI, called The Children’s Investment Fund Foundation. It has given grants to former President Clinton’s foundation and AIDS-support groups in Kenya and India.

TCI charges investors a fee, on average, of 1.5% of assets under management, plus 13.5% to 16.5% of profits. Of the management fee, a third goes to the charity. If net return exceeds 11%, investors must pay an additional 0.5% of assets to be directed to the charity.

In the year ending August 2006, the foundation received about $459 million from TCI and other sources, according to its U.K. filings. The money has flooded in so quickly that the foundation says it is unable to give most of it out yet. Last year, its grants totaled about $10 million. A spokeswoman said the figure is projected to rise to about $60 million next year. The Hohns have said they approach the charities they fund with the same exacting method Mr. Hohn brings to investments. The foundation employs “portfolio managers” to oversee its donations and track progress through numerical results.

Mr. Hohn is hoping to reap another windfall in his campaign at ABN, but he faces a reprise of the questions about his tactics. At an initial meeting this January with ABN Chief Executive Rijkman Groenink, Mr. Hohn brought along Davide Serra, who manages Algebris Investments. TCI has a minority stake in Algebris and the two funds have offices on adjacent floors of the same Mayfair building.

Mr. Groenink says he figured the two funds had a relationship. “Otherwise why then would these two hedge funds together ask for an appointment?” he asks. “I understood that indeed Mr. Serra had been doing all the analysis on ABN.”

In addition, Lord Rothschild’s fund acquired an undisclosed number of ABN shares between Feb. 21 and May 22. A spokesman for the fund says Lord Rothschild didn’t discuss the purchases with Mr. Hohn.

On April 23, ABN announced it had agreed to sell itself to Barclays for about $90 billion in stock, while breaking off an American banking unit for a separate sale. Mr. Hohn was upset. He favored a higher potential bid from the consortium of European banks, which wanted to keep the U.S. unit.

A few days later at ABN’s annual meeting, Algebris’s Mr. Serra asked Mr. Groenink why ABN shareholders weren’t being given the chance to vote on the offers. Before answering, Mr. Groenink said, “Mr. Serra is related or linked to TCI for those of you in the audience who don’t know that.”

Mr. Hohn wasn’t in the audience, but his lawyer was. Frank Peters took a microphone from a person sitting nearby. Mr. Serra “doesn’t work for TCI. He is not representing TCI,” said the lawyer.

Mr. Groenink had another reason to feel troubled by the hedge funds circling the bank, people familiar with the situation say. ABN’s board became concerned that someone was leaking information to Algebris’s Mr. Serra, a person familiar with the matter says.

In April, the European bank consortium sent a letter to ABN expressing its intention to bid for the bank. That same day, Mr. Serra telephoned a person close to ABN to inquire how the bank would respond to the bid, according to people briefed on the conversation. ABN directors and executives hadn’t yet received the consortium’s letter and didn’t know about the approach.

Mr. Serra said he didn’t make such a phone call and declined to comment further on alleged leaks. An ABN spokesman declined to comment.

Justice’s Inquiry

In late April, ABN’s chairman, Arthur Martinez, informed the board that the U.S. Department of Justice would be looking into allegations about an ABN executive as part of its previously disclosed investigation into ABN’s handling of money transfers from countries under U.S. sanctions. Mr. Serra called a person close to ABN and said he was aware of the new twist in the probe, according to people briefed on the conversation. Mr. Serra declined to comment on this reported call. Mr. Martinez and an ABN spokesman declined to comment about any possible leaks.

Mr. Hohn’s quest for fresh investment targets continues. In recent months, TCI has bought about $700 million worth of stock in railroad operator CSX Corp. Atticus, the hedge fund of Lord Rothschild’s son, owned 17.8 million CSX shares in March, according to a U.S. securities filing then, a holding worth about $730 million now. An Atticus spokesman reiterated that the fund makes its decisions independently and noted that Atticus owns shares in three other major U.S. rail companies.

A spokeswoman for CSX said company executives have met with TCI multiple times in recent months. Mr. Hohn accuses the company of refusing to lay out a clear plan for improving performance. A spokesman said the company has “the most aggressive financial targets in the industry.”

Write to Carrick Mollenkamp at carrick.mollenkamp@wsj.com, Jason Singer at jason.singer@wsj.com, Alistair MacDonald at alistair.macdonald@wsj.com and Edward Taylor at edward.taylor@wsj.com

RELATED ARTICLES AND BLOGS

 

Blog Posts About This Topic

•  allaboutalpha.com: Welcome to AllAboutAlpha.com  allaboutalpha.com

•  AP Headlines |  marketplace.publicradio.org

 

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119015661593331691.html?mod=hps_us_pageone

 

The highest-paid CFOs

Monday, September 17th, 2007

http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070917/REG/70914034

The highest-paid CFOs

The highest-paid CFOs
Pay trails CEOs’, but perks pop

By Michelle Leder

When it comes to compensation, chief financial officers still tend to fall well below chief executives, and even many of the other “named executive officers” (in public disclosure parlance) at their respective companies. Indeed, were it not for a new Securities and Exchange Commission rule that requires companies to disclose compensation for their “principal financial officer” regardless of compensation, many CFOs would not even make the list in the annual proxy statement’s summary compensation table. Consider: Chief financial officers at Fortune 500 companies earned about a third of the total compensation of CEOs, according to a survey of CFO pay produced by compensation firm Equilar earlier this year based on 2007 proxy disclosures.

But CFOs are showing signs of catching up in one critical area: the types of perks that normally go only to the top dog. Whether the extras are access to the corporate jet, generous relocation packages, tax gross-ups or hefty signing bonuses, this year’s crop of proxy statements showed that CFOs are no longer being left out. Here are a few examples:

Time Warner CFO Wayne Pace has been using the company’s corporate jet to commute between his home in Atlanta and his primary office in New York City. Though the arrangement appears to have been in place since 2001, this was the first time that Time Warner disclosed the deal, which cost $512,000 last year.

Clothing manufacturer Jones New York spent nearly $80,000 last year to provide CFO Wesley R. Card with an apartment in Manhattan, and another $77,000 to cover the tax gross-up on the perk.

Boston Scientific hired Sam Leno away from Zimmer Holdings after the medical devices company agreed to buy both of Mr. Leno’s homes for a guaranteed price of $1.3 million each.

FedEx CFO Alan B. Graf Jr. received a $435,000 tax reimbursement payment—otherwise known as a tax gross-up—to cover the tax bill on restricted stock that Mr. Graf received.

To be sure, many of these perks may simply be new disclosures that were required once the SEC’s rules on executive compensation changed, as opposed to new perks. After all, the Equilar study found that 20% of the Fortune 500 CFOs were not included in their company’s summary compensation tables because they were not among the top five in terms of compensation. Given that perks are usually disclosed in the “all other compensation” category in the tables, that alone would explain why some of these disclosures appear to be new.

“One of the dirty little secrets that came out of this season is that many executives do not live in the city where the company is based,” said Patrick McGurn, special counsel at Institutional Shareholder Services. “A large number are using it [the corporate plane] as a shuttle bus to and from home, and that’s disturbing on many levels.”

But it’s not just perks in which CFOs are catching up. As the spate of recent M&A and private equity deals shows, a growing number of CFOs at the companies that are being acquired are cleaning up. Considering that CFOs are usually among the first to be pushed aside when a company is acquired (after all, there’s a well-defined path for a CEO to morph into a chairman or a vice chairman, but no similar path for the surplus CFO), the hefty payouts may seem, at least to some, to be leveling the playing field.

At Station Casinos, for example, former CFO Glenn Christenson is set to receive $52 million once a private buyout of the Las Vegas-based casino chain is finalized. And he needn’t even be there for the final sign-off to cash his check: With the deal set to close by the end of this year, Mr. Christenson decided not to wait until then, opting to step down at the end of March.

And when North Fork was acquired by Capital One last year, CFO Daniel Healy wound up with around $26 million. That might seem like a lot, but it was only a fraction of the $288 million that went to the company’s three top executives. (More than $200 million to chairman and CEO John Kanas.)

“It will be interesting to see if all of this additional disclosure will drive up pay and perks,” said Mark Borges, a principal with Mercer Human Resource Consulting and the author of the Compensation Standards blog. “If anyone has had their responsibilities increased, it’s definitely been the CFO.” FW

See the other stories in the Financial Week Special Report on CFO pay:

Who the heck is Ulrich Schmidt, and why is he No. 17 on this list?

Bonuses: Out. Non-equity incentive comp: In. And how.

SEC has yet to deliver its final say on executive pay

Pay for performance? Yeah, maybe

Retirement bennies ‘pay’ for some top CFOs