Shift Risk to Uncle Sam?

Worried Bankers Seek
To Shift Risk to Uncle Sam

By DAMIAN PALETTA
February 14, 2008

WASHINGTON — The banking industry, struggling to contain the fallout from the mortgage debacle, is urgently shopping proposals to Congress and the Bush administration that could shift some of the risk for troubled loans to the federal government.

[Sheila Bair]

One proposal, advanced by officials at Credit Suisse Group, would expand the scope of loans guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration. The proposal would let the FHA guarantee mortgage refinancings by some delinquent borrowers.

Credit Suisse officials have met with senior officials from the Department of Housing and Urban Development, which runs FHA, and other policy makers to discuss the proposal.

The risk of the plan: If delinquent borrowers default on their refinanced loans in large numbers, the federal government would have to absorb the loss.

The fact that the plan is receiving serious consideration suggests the level of concern in Washington as housing problems worsen.

Some early efforts have fallen short. Last fall, the government backed a plan by banks to rescue bank-affiliated funds that had invested in mortgage-backed securities, but it fell through. More recently, a hotline set up with Washington’s support for troubled borrowers has helped only a small fraction of those in need.

Politicians and bankers are now abuzz with talk about broader ideas to prevent housing from deteriorating.

Another plan gathering support seeks to make it easier for banks to write off part of the unpaid balance on loans that exceed a property’s value, people familiar with the matter said. If that happens, homeowners would owe less, and they might be able to refinance their loans and avoid foreclosure.

Several lenders are already considering the move, known as a “principal charge off,” but are hesitant to move forward, in part because of legal concerns. However, if the industry came forward with a standard backed by the Treasury Department, it would be easier to make the write-offs.

“Everybody is looking at everything,” Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said. “The door is not closed on anything.”

The Credit Suisse plan would open the way for nearly 600,000 subprime borrowers, many of whom are delinquent on their mortgages, to refinance into loans backed by the FHA. Some 1.3 million borrowers were either seriously delinquent or in foreclosure at the end of the third quarter, the most recent numbers available from the Mortgage Bankers Association. The number is expected to rise.

In a 20-page summary handed out to lawmakers, policy makers and regulators, Credit Suisse said the plan would make $89 billion in subprime loans eligible for refinancing. Credit Suisse spokeswoman Victoria Harmon said bank officials have “shared our ideas and technical advice on FHA” and received “constructive” responses from the government.

Officials from J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. are pulling together their own proposal to expand the number of homeowners who could refinance into FHA-backed loans.

Just a few months ago, such proposals would have been considered far-fetched, but these and other unorthodox ideas are gaining credibility. “We’re looking at all of them,” said House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D., Mass.).

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson has said there is no “silver bullet” to solve the housing-market turmoil. This week, the government announced the latest idea, a mortgage-industry plan that would give seriously delinquent borrowers extra time to avoid foreclosure.

So far the government’s moves haven’t propped up the sagging housing market or thawed frozen credit markets. Mr. Paulson and Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke are expected to face questions on these issues today from lawmakers at a Senate Banking Committee hearing.

The panel’s chairman, Sen. Christopher Dodd (D., Conn.), is working on a plan that would resurrect a federal agency created during the 1930s to buy up distressed mortgages at “steep discounts” and help borrowers refinance into more-affordable loans.

Senior Treasury Department officials have been wary of proposals that could expose taxpayers to losses and bail out lenders, but they have been willing to entertain most ideas. Some congressional Republicans are becoming worried that as more bad news and data are released about the housing market, some proposals could expose taxpayers to severe losses.

“I would share the concern and nervousness about going in that direction,” said Rep. Scott Garrett (R., N.J.), a member of the House Financial Services Committee.

Sen. Charles Schumer (D., N.Y.) earlier this week urged the lending industry to move toward a standard of partially writing down the principal of loans that are considered “under water,” when the borrower owes more on the property than the home is actually worth. One reason some lenders appear to be gravitating toward this idea is that it would likely deflate a push by Democrats to pass a new law giving bankruptcy judges the ability to alter the terms and principal of mortgages. Sen. Schumer called the Credit Suisse plan “an interesting idea, which we are looking at pretty seriously.”

However, Credit Suisse still hasn’t won the endorsement of the American Securitization Forum, a large group of investors that carries significant influence over market decisions.

Write to Damian Paletta at damian.paletta@dowjones.com

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120294935869166831.html?mod=hpp_us_whats_news

Comments are closed.